- Have never read the explanations of the Actuarial Approach provided in our website,
- Have never tried to apply the basic principles endorsed,
- Have different agendas to pursue or
- Some combination of the above items.
Misperception #1—We advocate conservative investments.
Not true. We don’t advocate any specific investment strategy. Yes, we do recommend using assumptions consistent with annuity-based pricing to develop your Actuarial Budget Benchmark (ABB), but we believe determining the cost of your spending liabilities for this purpose is a separate issue from the issue of how best to invest your assets to accomplish your financial goals. The ABB is a budget developed using basic financial economic principles by comparing the market value of your assets with the approximate market value of your spending liabilities (i.e., the theoretical cost of purchasing currently available insurance annuity contracts to cover your future spending).
There are plenty of good reasons why you may or may not want to invest all or part of your assets in liability-driven investments (like annuities) or in more risky assets (like equities). We aren’t going to list those reasons here. We leave the decision of how best to invest your assets to meet your financial goals up to you with possible assistance from your financial advisor.
We acknowledge that the basic financial economics principle that the cost of future spending liabilities may be determined independently of the client’s investment mix is almost heretical within the financial advisor community. This community frequently concludes that client spending may be increased, within limits, by increasing the client’s investment risk; a result generally obtained by assuming historical real rates of return and variances will continue in the future. We counter this general conclusion by pointing to the problems created by public pension plan actuaries who similarly assumed plan contributions could be reduced simply by increasing investment risk, and to recent Actuarial Standards Board considerations requiring actuaries to disclose a low-investment risk liability in actuarial reports for public pension plans as a way to quantify the extra risk assumed by the plan sponsor (and taxpayers) resulting from the plan’s investment policy (similar in concept to what we advocate with our ABB calculation).
Misperception #2—We advocate conservative spending.
Not true. We don’t tell you how much you should spend each year. The amount you spend each year is your business (or your and your spouse’s business). We tell you how much you can afford to spend this year to meet your financial goals based on your financial situation and the assumptions you make about the future. If you use our recommended assumptions to calculate your ABB, you are calculating a current year spending budget based on a relatively low investment-risk strategy. Yes, this approach should produce a reasonably conservative spending budget. But, you don’t have to spend your ABB. The purpose of the ABB is to gauge how conservative or aggressive your current spending strategy is. Armed with this benchmark, you can choose the level of spending with which you are comfortable, and just as important, you can monitor how aggressive your spending is each year by annually comparing it with your annually revised ABB.
In our posts, we have discussed many ways that you can spend more aggressively by front-loading your spending. Several ways to do this without increasing your investment risk include:
- Assuming declining future real dollar future spending budgets,
- Assuming decreases in the spending budget upon the first death within a couple, or
- Treating some expenses (such as travel expenses) as non-recurring and thus not spreading them over your entire expected longevity planning period.
Partly untrue. While the simple Excel workbooks that we make available on our website to facilitate the present value calculations required under the general asset/liability matching model we advocate use deterministic assumptions, this doesn’t mean that our general individual model (the Basic Actuarial Equation) can’t accommodate stochastic modeling. Since we provide you with an ABB based on basic financial economics principles and don’t claim to provide you with the maximum amount of income that can be provided at a specified probability of success based on assumptions with respect to expected returns and variances associated with various types of investments, we don’t feel a need to complicate our simple models with unnecessary stochastic modeling. Unlike black-box stochastic models, our models are relatively transparent when deterministic assumptions are used, and unlike stochastic models, our process anticipates periodic future valuations to adjust for future experience that will inevitably differ from assumed experience.
Misperception #4—We advocate using only the Actuarial Approach to determine a reasonable spending budget
Not true. As discussed in our post of April 20, 2017 and as discussed above, we recommend that you consider your ABB as another “data point” to be used in making your spending decisions. Thus, we recommend that you use this calculation in combination with, and not in lieu of, other budgeting approaches you may be using that you find to be helpful.
Misperception #5—The Actuarial Approach is either too simple, not as sophisticated as Monte Carlo modeling and therefore inferior or it is too complicated for average individuals to use.
Partly untrue. As discussed above, quite a few people tend to conflate the Excel workbooks that we provide to facilitate the present value calculations required under the Basic Actuarial Equation with the more general process we refer to as The Actuarial Approach. The Actuarial Approach involves using three basic actuarial principles:
- Use of a generalized individual model that compares assets with liabilities (The Basic Actuarial Equation),
- Annual valuations to keep spending on track to meet financial goals, and
- Modeling of deviations in assumed experience to assess risk and assist financial planning
We will admit that the calculations required by the Actuarial Approach may unfortunately be beyond the comprehension of many individuals today. That is why we have targeted Intelligent Numbers People (INP) in our communications.
No one (not even actuaries or financial advisors) knows what your investments will earn in the future and no one knows how long you (or your spouse) will live. In fact, what we do know is that whatever assumptions we make about the future will be wrong, and future adjustments to spending plans will likely be required. These unknowns make spending budgeting a difficult task. Many stochastic models use historical experience to forecast future investment performance, and many clients rely on these models (and their questionably precise probability of success calculations) to make complex financial decisions regarding investments and spending. We have concerns about stochastic models that promise higher levels of spending without properly quantifying the additional risk. We also have concerns about blindly relying on the results of these models, particularly over extended periods of time without adjustment. And while no one knows what future investments will earn, we do know how much insurance companies are currently charging to provide income for life based on life annuity quotes. We believe that this “known” market pricing information can be useful in developing a low-investment-risk Actuarial Budget Benchmark that you can use in combination with the other approaches you are using to make better financial decisions.
Unlike others who may encourage you to use a specific budgeting approach, we have no financial stake in the decision you make. We won’t benefit financially if you decide to buy annuities or invest in equities or use the Actuarial Approach. We receive no direct or indirect income from advertising or hits to our site. Despite having to occasionally address these misperceptions and live with the baffling lack of support from our own profession, we remain passionate about recommending the same basic actuarial principles that we applied in our work as actuaries to help INPs make better financial decisions.
We encourage you to try to keep an open mind with respect to using the Actuarial Approach and give it a try rather than rejecting it out of hand simply because of misperceptions you may have heard or read about it.