Despite its obvious flaws, the 4% Rule of thumb for determining “safe” withdrawals from invested assets retains its popularity among many personal financial journalists, financial advisers, academics and bloggers. While experts acknowledge that the 4% Rule may have certain weaknesses, they claim that these flaws can be addressed with specific modifications. We at How Much Can I Afford to Spend have never been big fans of the 4% Rule, with or without proposed modifications, and we believe the Actuarial Approach is a far more robust approach for budgeting and personal retirement financial planning. Some of our posts on the 4% Rule include (in chronological order):
- October 9, 2014—20 Years of Drinking the 4% Rule Kool Aid
- June 24, 2015—Will “Ratcheting” the 4% Rule Make it Less Insane
- May 9, 2016 and June 3, 2016—Adjust the 4% Rule Enough and You Might End Up with Something as Good as the Actuarial Approach, Parts 1 and 2
- July 23, 2019—The Real Problems with Using the 4% Rule to FIRE
- June 14, 2020—Focus on Retirement Spending, Not Retirement Income