This post is a follow-up to our post of June 18, 2025 in which we addressed the magnitude of Social Security’s long-term funding hole based on results of the 2025 Trustees Report and their “intermediate assumptions.” Last week, Karen P. Glenn, the Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration (SSA) updated the primary 2025 results in a letter to Senator Ron Wyden reflecting SSA’s understanding of the tax provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA).
Developing and maintaining a robust financial plan in retirement is a classic actuarial problem involving the time-value of money and life contingencies. This problem is easily solved with basic actuarial principles, including periodic comparisons of household assets and spending liabilities.
Wednesday, August 13, 2025
Monday, August 11, 2025
Primary Reason Why Lifetime Income Products are Generally Better Investments for Retirees than Bonds
We advocate a Safety First (or Liability-Driven) Investment strategy for retired households which anticipates the use of relatively low-risk investments to fund future Essential Expenses (the Floor Portfolio) and higher-risk investments to fund future Discretionary Expenses (the Upside Portfolio). The non-risky assets/investments we advocate for the Floor Portfolio include:
- Social Security benefits
- Pension benefits
- Lifetime income annuities (SPIAs and DIAs)
- Tips ladders, and
- Non-lifetime fixed annuities
The first three items above (including deferring commencement of Social Security benefits) can be considered as lifetime income products for the purpose of this post.